Guide: Submitting to the Catalog (Components & Themes) + Staking
ChainRender's catalog — components, apps, and themes — is open and permissionless. You don't ask permission to be listed; you register with a refundable stake, and your entry appears. This guide covers the submission process and how staking works.
The philosophy: open entry, earned prominence
Anyone can submit; not everyone is surfaced equally. Entry is open to any wallet with a refundable stake. What you earn — through a clean history and community attestations — is prominence. No gatekeeper can block you; no one can be forced to feature you. This keeps the catalog un-censorable while still letting quality rise.
Submitting a component or app
- Build + grade + register your component (see Deploying an App) — it's now a live, content-addressed hash.
- Register a subname for it via the staked registrar (see Registering a Subname) — this is what surfaces it in the catalog.
- That's it — your entry is Active and discoverable. Prominence grows with a clean history and any attestations.
Submitting a theme
Themes are submitted to a ThemeSet (the ownerless, staking-aware theme registry):
- Author + preview your theme locally (see Authoring & Committing a Theme) — iterate at zero gas, and it must pass the built-in contrast + legibility invariants.
- Seed the theme CSS on-chain (content-addressed → a theme id).
- Submit the theme to a ThemeSet with a stake, the same open-entry model as components.
How staking works
The stake is a refundable anti-spam deposit — not a fee, not a payment, not a subscription:
- You post it when you register/submit.
- You get it back after a lock window passes with no upheld flag against your entry (state: Refunded). Your entry stays; only the deposit returns.
- It's only forfeited (Slashed) if a quorum of the immutable attester set upholds a flag against your entry — e.g. spam or abuse. Even then, slashing demotes your entry; it never blocks the system or censors you.
Why a stake at all? Because open, permissionless entry needs some cost to deter spam — but that cost shouldn't be a paywall or a gatekeeper's discretion. A refundable stake is the honest answer: it costs nothing to an honest participant (you get it back) and something to a spammer (they risk it, and lose it if flagged).
Ownerless economics
Every economic parameter — stake size, lock window, slash quorum, the treasury/sink, the reserved-name list — is fixed at deployment in the ownerless registrar. No admin can raise the stake, change the rules, or seize funds. Every wei is either refundable to you or routed by immutable rules. You're trusting code, not a foundation.
Related
- Registering a Subname · Authoring & Committing a Theme
- Trust Signals & Lineage — attestations + advisories, the prominence layer.
- Contracts → Registries